CONTACT THE GHK-Cu EDITORS / 09
Contact GHK-Cu Store about a study
Write when a study is described wrongly, a source is unclear, or a reviewed paper is missing.
When can the editors help?
The first GHK-Cu researchers wanted to understand tissue repair. Please write if a page here states their finding wrongly.
A note can point out an error, ask for the paper behind a number, or name a reviewed paper that is missing. The editors read each note and correct a page when the source calls for a change.
This inbox belongs to the editors, not a clinic or store. It cannot answer personal questions about use, doses, treatment, or sellers. No stock is held, no orders are taken, and no doctor fills a prescription here.
Questions about a paper are welcome. Tell the editors which page you read and which claim concerns you. That lets the editors check the same source you read.
What can the editors answer about a paper?
The editors explain reviewed GHK-Cu studies in plain words. Each source number leads to its paper on the GHK-Cu references and citations page.
The site does not print dosing plans, product reviews, seller lists, or medical advice. Human support is strongest for skin use; shots and whole-body use have much less support. An answer will say which kind of study stands behind the claim.
In your note, give the page title and the figure in question. Add the paper if you have it; the reply can point to the source and name any question that remains open.
Use the form below for a correction or a source question.